Totalitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Totalitarianism - Essay ExampleTotalitarianism is defined as a political organization in which the democracy strives to control all aspects of public and private life of its citizens. Totalitarian regimes stopover in power by employing widespread use of violence, disseminating propaganda through state controlled media, political oppression, denial of exemption of speech and control over the economy. However, Hannah Arendt perceives totalistic as a schema where the state transform relegate into mass movements, have the national police assume the role of the military to instill terror in sight and establish a foreign policy with the intention of domineering the whole world (Cohen & Fermon 575). Arendt argues that totalitarian movements established by totalitarian governments depend on the sheer force of numbers and not proportionable strength like other political parties. With this understanding, it is clear that communism, socialism, liberalism, feminism, conservatism and fascis m are totalitarian ideologies. This paper is mean to show that in the idea of Hannah Arendt, Benito Mussolini a fascist, Vladimir Lenin a communist, and Emma Goldman anarchist and feminist, were all totalitarians. At the end of the jump World War, Italy was found entangled in economic and political challenges. Public servants went on strike in urban centers while, in the rural areas, landless peasants grabbed the lieu of rich landlords. Benito Mussolini used this unrest as an chance to climb to power. He formed the fascist troupe which supported hard line nationalism, and condemned democratic system of government on the belief that competitor parties separated the state. They also reject communism and embraced personal property ownership. In the early 1920s, Mussolini and his supporters had worn the support of most Italian citizens by attacking the communists and socialists. In1922 Mussolini led Italians on a protest march on Rome supposedly to prevent a communist diversity bu t in a real sense to scare the government into appointing him as the prime subgenus Pastor of Italy. Immediately he was in office he enlarged his power by appointing fascistics to high positions, ban the press, organizing secret police, and outlawing condemnation of the government. He controlled the army and the schools making Italian citizens embrace the slogan Everything in the state and nothing outside or against the state (Cohen & Fermon 571). Mussolinis Italy was dominated by one party Fascist party and all opposition parties were wiped out. Mussolini also had a lot of power over this party, until people argued that the party had no part in running of the country but Mussolini himself. He later decided that he requisites to run the country for himself and that the party is no longer important for anything else than doing what he wanted. Mussolini believed in making Italy gigantic by making Italians go to war by all means. On his coming to power, he make Italians to belief th at he was their savior considering hard times they were facing. He replaced the class society with the masses so that he can avoid criticism and later ruled them with the iron fist. For this, his actions constituted totalitarianism as defined by Arendt. Mussolini faulted the American democracy arguing that people do not know what they want and the best for them. He swore that someday America will know that democracy is only beautifully theoretically but a fallacy practically (Cohen & Fermon 532). Mussolini would have been right here when he said that people do not know what they want during voting in leaders. It has always been known that most of the leaders win elections because of their influence and not their ideology. The best people with good ideologies are normally left out. Vladimir Lenin believed in a