'The True Story of Joan/John\r'

'There is a finely line between hinge upon and sexuality. In fact, roughly probably do not even go that there is even difference between the devil! People just assume a boy should act give care a boy and a girl should act comparable a girl. company forces us to come back and be obligate that way. If you think around it when a baby girl is born everything is pink, unless not all girls love the color pink. partnership shapes the role of separately child based on its biological sex. What happens if you do not behave like your sex is supposed to behave? In the article, â€Å"The truthful Story of Joan/ thaumaturgy,” Joan does not act like the womanish that her surrounding campaigned on her to be.This article tells the story of a man who goes through a long travel of finding himself. John was born male, and because through complications was told he was a young-bearing(prenominal) and now he indentifies himself as a male. I cannot comprehend how traumatic thes e sex and sex changes were on his life-time. In this ane situation it shows how John, who was always told he was a girl, cool off behaved a like a male because in reality at birth he was. This showcase makes me think that fellowship plays a part in deciding your grammatical sexuality and who you are. However, John was pushed to behave like a girl. He never did, he cute to play with the stereotypical â€Å"boy” toys like trucks.Is it realistic that your biological sex can determine your gender? Social constructionist is not totally correct or accurate. There are girls that are tomboys and boys that gay or just super feminine. Society cannot always push people in the route that they want them in. A majority of times when an individual, like John, does not correct to monastic order they are ridiculed. Harassment can have many effects and sometimes the effect is not to conform them and it can be as serious as suicide. Society interrupts a child’s growth and ind ividuality. In the case of Joan / John, he was living a â€Å"double life”.He knew at a very young age that something was wrong. He didn’t like being put in dresses or playing with dolls. â€Å"Joan” just wasn’t do like other females her age and just virtually(predicate) everyone was noticing that. Social constructionism is pushing John to behave otherwise than how he wants to behave. In a way society was disturbing his normal growth as a child by changing who he intellection he was, his gender identity. In the end, he knew he was a male, which relates back to gender essentialism. Dr. coin definitely besidesk advantage of John’s parents by openhanded them false knowledge.John’s parents were so uninformed about everything that was going on with John’s situation. Dr. Money was a very strict social constructionist that believed if he told John he was a female then he would be a female. How could Dr. Money, a doctor, think that telling a child that it is a particularized sex and that it would grow up believing and playacting like that sex? Things just don’t work like that. I think genes and your sex have a big part in identifying your gender. Each situation for each child is so incredibly different I find it too extraordinary that society and environment could change the identity of a psyche.I do not think that gender essentialism or social constructionism is the way, but a fit in between the two. Gender essentialism and social constructionism altercate each other. The two are the extremes of reality. A eternal rest between the two is how people live each and every day. In the situation of John, his life shows a journey through all three ways, gender essentialism, social constructionism and reality. Dr. Money believed in social constructionism, but enchantment John was told he was a female he showed his belief in gender essentialism. He ignored people because he â€Å"knew” something wa s not just and that he should be a male.Now he lives his life as a male but in what I call â€Å"reality”. He listens to society in some ways but he focuses on being a father and that to him is what a male is, a father. The article challenges the two debate beliefs because no one knows the correct answer. Each person and situation is different. Maybe for some the theory of gender essentialism will push them to be who they truly are, while for others it may be society, the theories of social constructionism. For the rest it is reality, a combination of the two. Works Cited Colapinto, John. â€Å"â€Å"The True Story of Joan/John”. ” Rolling Stone 11 Dec. 1997: 54-97. Print.\r\n'